All agents

Win it

Proposal

First-draft proposals and statements of work grounded in your past engagements, your methodology and your own pricing philosophy — not a blank page and a general-purpose model.

  • Draws on comparable engagements you have actually delivered — their type, fee, size and length
  • Investment anchored in what comparable work was priced at, not a guess
  • Tells you when the record is too thin to draft well, rather than guessing
  • Past engagements go in as de-identified facts — never another client's name or documents

What it looks like

The real interface, on a sample engagement.

Win it

Draft — Acme Corp Expansion, Phase 2 SOW

Grounded in four comparable engagements, the firm's fixed-fee methodology and its own pricing philosophy. Not a blank page and a general-purpose model.

Requested 11 minutes ago · draft-0142

PipelinePhase 2 PRD §4.6
  1. 1. Context

    4 comparable engagements

  2. 2. Positioning

    angle scored 4/4

  3. 3. Drafting

    3 iterations

  4. 4. Quality gate

    passed

ConfidenceMedium

Strong on delivery history and pricing precedent. Thin on the client’s current procurement posture — no material in the record since March.

Context depth

Moderate

The record could not tell me who signs off procurement now that Dale has moved on.

Draft

Executive summary

Acme's phase-two ERP consolidation carries the same feed-latency exposure that moved phase one to capped T&M in January. This proposal prices that risk explicitly rather than absorbing it.

Problem framing

Three of the four source systems still lack a validated export contract. On a fixed-fee basis that is an unpriced dependency on the client's own delivery.

Proposed approach

Two gated stages. Stage one validates feeds against an agreed acceptance test; stage two prices delivery once that test passes.

Deliverables

Feed acceptance report · consolidated mapping specification · cutover runbook · two weeks of hypercare.

Scope boundary drawn from the pattern library

On fixed-fee ERP consolidations, scope decisions taken without written client sign-off were re-argued at a median of week 14. Stage one therefore closes on a signed acceptance test, not an email.

See a Friday report drafted live, on a sample engagement.

Or write tohello@buildaether.com

For consulting firms of 25–100 people, especially on fixed-fee work.